
Was the invasion of Tibet in 1951 a so-called 'peaceful liberation' or was it an invasion followed with over 50 years of brutality and suppression under Chinese rule? I am arguing that what the government of the People’s Republic of China calls a 'peaceful liberation' is anything but peaceful and I will give arguments to prove it in light of recent news reports and also of the issues history. The Tibet issue has been a highly controversial topic and also has been hot on the headlines for the past 60 or so years. I am going to look at both perspectives that being from the Chinese perspective and also from the Tibetan perspective in relation to the issue of potential Tibetan independence. The topic of Tibetan liberation and independence is a very vast topic to deal with as it is a religious, political, and environmental issue as well as the violation and clear neglect of fundamental human rights. Abuses of human rights in the region include that of torture, disappearances, poor and unjust prison sentences, denial of fair public trial, denial of freedom of speech and of press and Internet freedoms. They also include political and religious repression, forced abortions, sterilisation, and also infanticide. Of course with every issue there is two sides and perspectives concerning the topic either being for or against. In terms of the current situation in Tibet and the plight of the Tibetan people there is either a stance in support of Tibet being under Beijing rule or for the possible independence of Tibet.


